Trial Lawyer’s Journal is built on the voices of trial lawyers like you. Share your journey, insights, and experiences through articles, interviews, and our podcast, Celebrating Justice.
Sign up for our newsletter to get the latest from TLJ.
Joint tortfeasors are two or more parties who are jointly responsible for causing harm to a plaintiff through their separate or combined acts of negligence or wrongdoing. In a personal injury case, this means multiple defendants may share legal liability for the same injury or damages.
Joint tortfeasors can be held liable together (joint liability), separately (several liability), or both—depending on state law.
Defendants become joint tortfeasors when their actions each contribute to a single, indivisible harm—like a car crash involving multiple drivers or unsafe conditions caused by multiple property owners. The key is that the injury would not have occurred without each party’s involvement.
Joint tortfeasor status doesn’t require the defendants to have acted together or intentionally—only that their actions combined to cause the same harm.
Each defendant contributes to the same injury, even if unintentionally.
Liability can arise from separate acts that lead to a combined result.
Applies to both negligence and intentional torts.
No need for prior agreement or coordination between the tortfeasors.
Depending on the jurisdiction, courts apply joint liability, several liability, or a mix called joint and several liability:
Joint liability: Each defendant is responsible for the entire judgment; the plaintiff can collect full damages from any one.
Several liability: Each defendant pays only their share of fault.
Joint and several liability: Plaintiff can recover full damages from any one defendant, who may then seek contribution from others.
The rules vary by state and can affect how much each defendant ends up paying—even if they were only partly at fault.
Plaintiff may collect full compensation from one party, even if others are involved.
Defendants can sue each other for contribution or indemnity.
State law determines whether joint or several liability applies.
Settling with one defendant may affect claims against others.
If one joint tortfeasor settles, it can affect how the remaining claims are handled. In many states, a settlement offsets the amount owed by the remaining defendants. Some jurisdictions allow the remaining parties to seek contribution from the settling party, while others bar such claims.
It’s critical to understand how settlement agreements impact overall liability and recovery.
Settling with one tortfeasor may reduce the total claim, depending on the state.
Plaintiff may still pursue others for the remaining damages.
Defendants may lose contribution rights against a settling co-defendant.
Carefully structured settlements are needed to preserve full recovery.
Courts often use comparative fault principles to assign percentages of responsibility among joint tortfeasors. The total damage award is divided based on these percentages, unless the court applies joint liability. In some cases, one party may be deemed primarily responsible—even if others share some blame.
Expert testimony, accident reconstruction, and fact-based analysis all help determine fault shares.
Fault is divided by percentage, based on each party’s role.
Comparative negligence rules apply, particularly in multi-party accidents.
Judges or juries decide fault allocation, based on the evidence.
Defendants may argue over who pays what, even after judgment.
Joint tortfeasors are multiple parties who share legal responsibility for a plaintiff’s injury. Understanding how fault, liability, and damages are distributed between them is key to pursuing a full recovery in personal injury cases. Whether you’re a plaintiff or a defendant, the rules governing joint tortfeasors can significantly shape the outcome of a case.
A joint tortfeasor is one of multiple defendants who contributed to the same injury. Each may be partially or fully responsible for the damages awarded.
Yes. In states that apply joint and several liability, a plaintiff can recover all damages from one defendant, who may then seek contribution from others.
Courts use comparative fault to assign percentages of liability based on each defendant’s role. These percentages determine how much each defendant pays.
The settlement may reduce the amount the plaintiff can recover from others. It can also impact whether the remaining defendants can seek contribution.
What is a Demurrer Judgment? A Demurrer Judgment is a court ruling issued after a defendant files a demurrer, arguing that the plaintiff’s complaint.
What is the TPPRA? The TPPRA, or Third Party Payor Recovery Act, is a legal statute—most notably used in states like Texas—that gives third-party.
What are Jury Instructions? Jury instructions are the formal legal directions given by a judge to the jury before deliberation in a trial. These.
Discover Next
Learn from industry experts about key cases, the business of law, and more insights that shape the future of trial law.